In this video, Melissa Tablada shares what the difference is between artificial contraception (birth control) and Natural Family Planning (NFP).💊
Catechism of the Catholic Church para. 2370:
“Periodic continence, that is, the methods of birth regulation based on self-observation and the use of infertile periods, is in conformity with the objective criteria of morality. These methods respect the bodies of the spouses, encourage tenderness between them, and favor the education of an authentic freedom. In contrast, ‘every action which, whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible’ is intrinsically evil:
Thus the innate language that expresses the total reciprocal self-giving of husband and wife is overlaid, through contraception, by an objectively contradictory language, namely, that of not giving oneself totally to the other. This leads not only to a positive refusal to be open to life but also to a falsification of the inner truth of conjugal love, which is called upon to give itself in personal totality. . . . The difference, both anthropological and moral, between contraception and recourse to the rhythm of the cycle . . . involves in the final analysis two irreconcilable concepts of the human person and of human sexuality.“
Do you think there’s a difference between Contraception and Natural Family Planning? Why or why not?
Let me know below in the comment box!
Looking to deepen your prayer life?
In this 30-day challenge, read the Catechism’s ENTIRE section on Christian Prayer and make a commitment to setting aside daily intentional time with the Lord.
30 MINUTES for 30 DAYS to grow in both your understanding and discipline of prayer!